Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Have the political winds about drilling shifted?
Posted by: McQ on Saturday, August 02, 2008

Well of course they have. And look who is shifting with them:
"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama said in an interview with The Palm Beach Post.

"If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage - I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done," Obama said.
In other words, his opposition isn't rooted in principle, it's just a representation of party dogma. And if adhering to the dogma is going to cost him votes, why then he's not too "rigid" about his supposed beliefs.

"New" politics, eh?

And on a related subject, see if you can follow the logic here - Suddenly Obama is for an energy policy, to include drilling, that can bring gas prices down, but right after that, he talks about a second 'stimulus' package of 50 billion dollars (half in $1,000 checks and half in "infrastructure" repairs) taken from "windfall taxes" on oil companies.

Can anyone see the inherent problem in that plan? Once more for the record - corporations don't pay taxes, people do.

So who will pay those windfall taxes and where is the most likely place that will happen?

Yes - at the pump. And how will they do that? By raising prices there.

Brilliant.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Can someone please explain what is wrong with a business making a profit. I don’t consider 8 to 10% an unreasonable return on an investment. I have managed businesses at $25M per year, and my bosses expected me to have revenues exceed costs by 12 to 15%. Otherwise, they could fire everyone sell the plant and put their money in stocks. This is America. We are supposed to make money.

Bruce is absolutely correct about taxes. When the government taxes a product, they do not tax the business. They tax the consumer. Gasoline is a perfect example. If Exxon’s crude oil prices increase, they raise the prices accordingly and drivers get the bill. The next time you see Chuck Schumer’s swarmy face complaining about windfall profits on oil think about this. At $4 per gallon, Exxon makes 40¢; New York State, 63¢ and the US Government, 24¢. Who’s zoomin’ who?

The best thing the government could do is remove the unreasonable restrictions on energy and fuel producers, open the continental shelf to oil exploration and production, fast track environmental impact surveys for refineries and power plants and eliminate the boutique gasoline requirements imposed be individual states.

We are in this fix today because of the actions of our government. The least they can do is get the f**k out of the way and let the free markets work their way out.
 
Written By: arch
URL: http://
Could someone please explain to me how repealing the gas tax is pandering but announcing that you’ll give everyone a check for $1,000 isn’t?
 
Written By: SaveFarris
URL: http://
Saying that drilling must be considered as part of a broader energy policy is the political equivalent of saying .. "I’d like to talk about something else" as this stance gives him the final option, most notably after the election, to simply say no.

There is no real change .. Obama just doesn’t like being beaten about the head and face by an issue that he knows will take him down. His energy policy (as outlined on his web site) has no such point that would include additional oil drilling and he has repeatedly said that it won’t help.
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
Now this is cruel.
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
I just cannot wait for the MSM to tell us why Obama is now flip-flopping changing his mind on offshore drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).

Perhaps it is because he "cares" about the American people. The same people he wants to take a large dildo and shove up their backsides.

The same people who, if they realize that he is saying something completely different this week from last week, are "just not listening to me."

The same people who are bitter about the guns and their bibles.

The same people who, if they happen not to support him, are just mean and racist and all that.

How this man still has a chance at winning is beyond me. Watch some of the sheeple at his "rallies" and you can tell that this country is in deep trouble. Some of them applaud when he clears his throat to think up something to follow "hope" and "change."
 
Written By: James Marsden
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider