Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
"It Begins (Part II)
Posted by: McQ on Thursday, October 23, 2008

George Will characterizes government at both the state and federal level as recently having a number of "Willie Sutton" moments. Sutton was a famous and quite prolific bank robbers of years gone by.

What caught Will's attention is something the brain trust in Congress is dreaming up (much like the 401(k) scam I talked about below). In this case, it's a bi-partisan bit of lunacy:
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., recently convened a discussion of how colleges and universities should be spending their endowments. Grassley, who says more than 135 institutions each have endowments of more than $500 million, says perhaps they should be required to spend 5 percent of their endowments each year. Welch has introduced legislation to require that percentage be spent to reduce tuition and other student expenses.

This government reach for control of private resources comes even though last year colleges and universities spent, on average, 4.6 percent of their endowments. Furthermore, most endowments are too small to be a significant source of captured money.
Obviously with that much money laying around not being taxed by government, it becomes a priority to try to figure out how to force a private entity to spend its own money so that situation can be remedied and a government revenue stream established.

The excuse? Well, if we force them to spend that amount it will be a good thing, because we'll force them to reduce tuition and other student expenses with it (while we tax the hell out of it).

However, the institutions which fit this standard ($500 million+ endowments) are already doing that more than any of the others in both those areas. And there's also something else which would be effected if these institutions are forced to spend 5% of their endowment yearly.
But only 45 private institutions have endowments of more than $1 billion. Among the other 98 percent (1,565) of institutions, the median endowment is just $14 million. So government in a Willie Sutton mood would target the wealthiest institutions — those that are the foundation of basic research that undergirds American prosperity, and that have the most generous financial aid programs for students.
Most likely institutions will have to cut spending elsewhere in order to preserve their "seed corn". One obvious area which may see cuts is research.

And the Feds aren't the only ones looking for new and innovative ways to get money it doesn't have any moral right too:
Some Massachusetts state legislators, committing two of the seven deadly sins, are angry because tax revenues do not match their ambitions, and envious of Harvard. They suggest raising more than $1 billion annually with a 2.5 percent assessment on the nine colleges and universities in the state that have endowments of more than $1 billion.
So it's just not the "rich" 5% of citizens they're after, it is also the rich educational institutions. In Harvard's case, we're now up to 7.5% gone each year (Fed and MA). And I don't think I have to argue very forcefully that if MA makes that sort of "assessment" work (not a tax, an assessment - that's much different, isn't it?) other states with similar institutions will do the same.

And then they'll begin to lower the target amount for the qualifying endowment and do it again.

Anyone? What will go up accordingly?

Tuition and fees, of course. As we've discussed, ad nauseum, the law of unintended consequences will again strike and instead of stimulating the desired (or promised) result, exactly the opposite will occur.

But the real nut of this article by Will is found in his concluding four paragraphs:
So it goes. The almost erotic pleasure of spending money that others have earned and saved is one reason people put up with the tiresome aspects of political life. And now the government's response to the financial crisis, including the semi-nationalization of nine major banks, has blurred — indeed, almost erased — the distinction between public and private sectors.

Hundreds of billions of dollars that the political class would have liked to direct for its own social and political purposes have been otherwise allocated. That allocation, by government fiat rather than by market forces, must reduce the efficiency of the nation's stock of capital. Which in turn will reduce economic growth, and government revenues, just as the welfare state — primarily pensions and medical care for the elderly — becomes burdened by the retirement of 78 million baby boomers.

As government searches with increasing desperation for money with which it can work its will, Willie Sutton Moments will multiply. Government has an incentive to weaken the belief that the nation needs a vigorous and clearly demarcated sector of private educational and philanthropic institutions exercising discretion over their own resources.

So the frequently cited $700 billion sum is but a small fraction of the cost, over coming decades, of today's financial crisis. The desire of governments to extend their control over endowments and foundations is a manifestation of the metastasizing statism driven by the crisis. For now, its costs, monetary and moral, are, strictly speaking, incalculable.
You can't say you aren't being warned 12 days before the election. It's all starting to line up. The mask is slipping fairly regularly. And if what everyone expects to happen on November 4th, does indeed happen, there won't be a brake in the entire system to prevent those who want to tax your 401(k) or make private entities spend mandated percentages of their savings or just about any other revenue scheme they can dream up from getting what they want.

Not one.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Grassley is a RINO. And he probably thinks forcing institutions to spend a minimum of their endowment will lower the government’s student aid output, which if true is silly. Grassley is a fool who should have retired a long time ago.
 
Written By: Grimshaw
URL: http://
SPREAD THE WEALTH!
 
Written By: Shark
URL: http://
Save the plumber save the world
 
Written By: DAve
URL: http://
"You can’t say you aren’t being warned 12 days before the election."In well over fifteen years now, Bruce, I never saw you write anything remotely so pathetic.

If not for the durability of sentiment, I would go to my place and make you a laughing-stock over that.
 
Written By: Billy Beck
URL: http://www.two—four.net/weblog.php
This and the rest isn’t just about the goverment getting access to money.

Add in the rules where you can withdraw 401(k)/IRA money without penalty. This will cause people to damage their nest eggs early when contributions are needed most or withdraw money at times of fear of a crash. The penalty was a wonderful inhibition against temptation and panic.

No only for an individual but when your significant other is a ’live in the moment’ idiot. The penalty was a good excuse to not touch the money.

These moves will cause people to not save for unemployment, old age or illness. They’ll live close to the edge. And when they retire or fall on hard times, they’ll look to the nanny state to take care of them.
 
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
Save the plumber save the world
Gave me a chuckle.
 
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
Could be an ugly several years ahead.

Dems are already profiting from their Fannie/Freddie foolishness. We may be at the beginning of a vicious cycle of more socialism causing more economic distress which is used to justify more socialism... and so on until there’s very little private sector left.
 
Written By: TallDave
URL: http://deanesmay.com
Hmm, don’t forget that a certain Presidential candidate is the alumnus of two universities that will be affected by this nonsense, and therefore they might have a better than usual avenue to use in lobbying against it.

Because, Republican or Democrat, that’s all this political system is: a bunch of people arguing over who gets the power to decide who recieves government money and who sends the government money. There are two main groups, but it doesn’t really matter which one is power because neither one gives a *%^$ about any Joe the Plumber or Tito the Construction Worker beyond the effort needed to con him into voting on their side.
 
Written By: kishnevi
URL: http://kishnevi.wordpress.com/
And if what everyone expects to happen on November 4th, does indeed happen, there won’t be a brake in the entire system to prevent those who want to tax your 401(k) or make private entities spend mandated percentages of their savings or just about any other revenue scheme they can dream up from getting what they want.

And this will be different from the way it was on November 3rd how? Shoulda voted Ron Paul.
 
Written By: Noumenon
URL: http://
"You can’t say you aren’t being warned 12 days before the election."

The same dolts who will yelp and yell next year after Obama fuggs them up the a$$ will say that "no one warned us" that their taxes would be raised, or that Obama would force them into Obamacare, or that he is completely unprepared to defend America in the world.

It is almost as if everyone went to sleep, and we wake up on January 20 with Doofus the Clown at the wheel headed over a cliff, and we are surprised because we were warned that Doofus the Clown was taking charge but no one paid any attention.
 
Written By: James Marsden
URL: http://
You’re right, McQ - these guys actually think someone has to pay the credit card bill that you and the rest of the Bush cultists ran up. What a bunch of nutjobs.

Your best post of all time was the one the other day about the "millenials" sense of entitlement. You have officially entered Powerline territory - incoherence and Orwellianism at the same time.

You’re awesome, McQ.
 
Written By: mkultra
URL: http://
"You can’t say you aren’t being warned 12 days before the election."

The same dolts who will yelp and yell next year after Obama fuggs them up the a$$ will say that "no one warned us" that their taxes would be raised, or that Obama would force them into Obamacare, or that he is completely unprepared to defend America in the world.

It is almost as if everyone went to sleep, and we wake up on January 20 with Doofus the Clown at the wheel headed over a cliff, and we are surprised because we were warned that Doofus the Clown was taking charge but no one paid any attention.
They are basically voting against Republicans to punish Bush. Bush, who will be in Texas [with no income taxes] in 3 months regardless of who wins.

And in part many are punishing Bush for policies the Democrats will implement at magnitudes of higher levels.
 
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
You’re awesome, McQ.
Isn’t he, now? Glad you can appreciate that mk.
 
Written By: capt joe
URL: http://
Thhr16 qvzurpcmkyam, [url=http://fukycoaprndl.com/]fukycoaprndl[/url], [link=http://nwrkqqzzecss.com/]nwrkqqzzecss[/link], http://nsitqdaijool.com/
 
Written By: qdbnhvt
URL: http://mwwvcvxdbaoc.com/
xtrtnO qwdrbitkfdsn, [url=http://mpkrjnwgzpwj.com/]mpkrjnwgzpwj[/url], [link=http://qspmkbxzzuli.com/]qspmkbxzzuli[/link], http://llzoyflcotlj.com/
 
Written By: kjhwnfy
URL: http://gneskvwshixw.com/
fJ1mam ekshgoeebfrj, [url=http://xkorgahmyscc.com/]xkorgahmyscc[/url], [link=http://lvmlcqjepjgn.com/]lvmlcqjepjgn[/link], http://cgzjxilguaqq.com/
 
Written By: ofylmko
URL: http://mrrnsfzlghwv.com/

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider