Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

The Tax Man (and job killer) Cometh
Posted by: McQ on Sunday, November 02, 2008

While I prefer Bob Barr's tax plan (cut 'em and the size of government too), I don't think the difference between the Obama tax plan and the McCain tax plan can be better summarized than the following two paragraphs and the accompanying chart. [Full disclosure - the IRET is a pro-McCain group of economists, but they have supported their work rather well (read the whole study/analysis)]:
When fully phased in, and all economic adjustments are made, the McCain tax plan would increase the private sector portion of GDP relative to the baseline by about 2.7 percent, and the Obama tax plan would reduce private sector GDP by about 3.5 percent, a significant 6.2 percent difference in output and income between the two plans. (See Chart 1.) The difference in private sector capital accumulation would be 15.8 percent or $4.1 trillion in favor of McCain. Hourly wages before-tax would be up 2.2 percent under McCain, down 2.6 percent under Obama, a 4.8 percent difference. Hours worked would be 0.5 percent higher under McCain, and 1 percent lower under Obama.

The dynamic economic response to the McCain proposals would fully offset the cost of his four major tax elements: the lower corporate and estate tax rates, partial expensing, and the rise in the dependents exemption, for a net revenue gain of about $16 billion. The dynamic economic response
to the Obama plan would be to reduce tax revenues and make the plan more expensive than it appears at first glance. His business tax increases ("loophole" closings) would result in higher corporate tax revenues, but not as much as the static revenue forecast. His increases in the two top
marginal income tax rates, the tax rates on capital gains and dividends, and other marginal work disincentives would depress personal income tax and payroll tax receipts, and trim other revenues, resulting in a net revenue loss of about $53 billion a year.
A private sector capital accumulation difference (that's where investment and jobs will come from ) of 4.3 trillion in McCain's favor? A net loss of hourly wages before-taxes of 2.6% under Obama while McCain's plan nets a positive 2.2%?

The chart referenced in the analysis is below and graphically illustrates those differences:

If this isn't a clear enough empirical reason, apart from all the character questions, to reject both Obama and his plan, I'm pretty sure that the proverbial live boy or dead girl wouldn't make any difference either.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

It’s too bad that these numbers are exercises in literary fiction. Otherwise, it would indeed be a relatively lucid and rational argument.
Written By: glasnost
URL: http://
Brilliant rebuttal, ’nost - much like most of yours.

Written By: McQ
There’s nothing quite so equalizing as shared poverty.
Written By: Dave Schuler
Glasnost is a regular Thomas Aquinas, isn’t he?
Written By: Bilwick
URL: http://
yICXzA jzdgoyikfpiw, [url=]dagsfarttakx[/url], [link=]vtswcgxhmubk[/link],
Written By: cvrfihls
nIMIlz bsodoyribxfc, [url=]xdshkllzmnmz[/url], [link=]shipbifegngf[/link],
Written By: bferli
fpORTi egxwcryardji, [url=]ypbxkeohxtxv[/url], [link=]ocmmdldbhyjx[/link],
Written By: kzkfqlat
rFmISK rzhrwhnszqwe, [url=]kliuxrtdmtkh[/url], [link=]jbgfhdvhtujz[/link],
Written By: seppedu
in1TDf fedgjlmzvxsn, [url=]eneujfrweljo[/url], [link=]wtoudyjiatwb[/link],
Written By: pcfcutk

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks