Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
The Looming Danger
Posted by: McQ on Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard outlines the looming danger if the results of this election are as expected:
It is not just that the Democrats will win a crushing victory in both houses of Congress, perhaps reaching the 60-seat Senate threshold that lets them steam-roll legislation. It is also that the incoming class of 2008 is of a new creed. Many no longer believe – or actively reject – the free trade and free market catechisms.
We've already heard the spin - it was deregulation, it was Wall Street, it was the market which caused the financial problems we now suffer. And the probable incoming crew is all about letting government solve all of these problems.

Of course the fact that the government now owns many financial institutions via this absurd bailout seems to bolster their argument. But in fact, and as usual, it is a government solution to a government manufactured problem. However, it seems that's not the favored "truth" at this particular political moment in time.
No matter that statist policies were responsible for this global crisis in the first place. It was Western governments that set interest rates too low for too long, encouraging us all to abuse credit.

It was Eastern governments that held down their currencies to pursue mercantilist trade advantage, thereby accumulating vast foreign reserves that had to be recycled. Hence the bond bubble. This is the deformed creature known as Bretton Woods II. Protectionist Democrats are right to complain that the game is rigged. Free trade? Laugh on.

But at this point I have given up hoping that we will draw the right conclusions from this crisis. The universal verdict is that capitalism has run amok.
That of course means what? Much more intrusion by government is inevitable - a assertion that is bolstered by the conventional wisdom Evans-Pritchard outlines above and aided by a press which, for the most part, has been unquestionably supportive of the Democrat's framing of the argument and a public which simply doesn't seem to understand the politics or economics of this melt down.
For those who missed it, I recommend Edward Stourton's BBC interview with Eric Hobsbawm, the doyen of Marxist history.

"This is the dramatic equivalent of the collapse of the Soviet Union: we now know that an era has ended," said Mr Hobsbawm, still lucid at 91.

"It is certainly greatest crisis of capitalism since the 1930s. As Marx and Schumpeter foresaw, globalization not only destroys heritage, but is incredibly unstable. It operates through a series of crises.

"There'll be a much greater role for the state, one way or another. We've already got the state as lender of last resort, we might well return to idea of the state as employer of last resort, which is what it was under FDR. It'll be something which orients, and even directs the private economy," he said.
Does anyone doubt, given the promises made, that there is certainly a "much greater role for the state" planned for in an Obama administration? Anyone?

And does it stretch credulity at all, given the probable make up of Congress, that such a role will have little resistance as it is proposed and passed?

Evans-Pritchard goes on to point out how Europe is in much worse shape than the US although it doesn't seem to understand that or why that's the case. He's of the opinion they'll try to again lean on more government to solve the problem of too much government to begin with.

With that he concludes that Obama's "socialism" is much preferable to the "Hegelian broth nearing the boil in Europe."

I'd hasten to point out that his preference is a relative thing. Obama's "socialism" is the first step down the same path that Europe has already traveled. In a sense, Evans-Pritchard is saying that at this time, he'd prefer the lesser of two evils because relatively speaking he knows it won't be worse than what Europe is about to put itself through. And he hopes we'll figure it out before we're too far down that path.

On the other hand, it appears we plan on repeating that history despite it's obvious outcome. What's infuriating is that for those who will take the time to study Europe's problems, they are recent, they are obviously created by government and they have proven economically debilitating for those who've lived through them.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
"still lucid at 91"

As lucid as a Marxist can ever be, at any rate.
 
Written By: timactual
URL: http://
But Obama will pay my gas and morgage if I support him.


/barf
 
Written By: retired military
URL: http://
Perhaps the biggest unqarrented assumption being made here is that these people are about the economic and social advancement of America. I suggest the events as you describe them only make sense if the DESTRUCTION of America.. both socially and economically, is their goal.

So much for the crap that ’we’re all Americans’

 
Written By: Bithead
URL: http://bitsblog.florack.us
It’s not destruction Bit! It’s making America into the fuzzy warm image they believe it should have.
Hearts as big as the all outdoors, giving giving giving, warm fuzzy bunnies, kitties and happy polar bears.
Punishing the greedy rich.
Helping out the poor and under privileged.
Being ’fair’ to everyone.

I mean it’ll be blue skies for all!

(And not an ounce of common sense or fact in sight)
 
Written By: looker
URL: http://
Well periodically they get the chance to screw things up, then the public remembers why they don’t like liberals. Then some good conservatives fix things for a little while, then they get replaced with fake conservatives and jobbers, then they screw up, Then the cycle repeats, rinse, wash.

 
Written By: kyleN
URL: http://impudent.blognation.us/blog
I recommend moving to Alaska and joining Todd Palin’s secessionist movement.
 
Written By: TomD
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider