|
Unfortunately this "research" is published at the "Institute for Creation Research". Any "science" coming out of an anti-scientific body like this must be taken with a huge grain of salt. |
| |
Written By:
A.N.Onymous
URL:
http://
|
Well obviously, then, given the most important aspect of all of this is where it is published, it will easily be taken apart by "science".
Go for it.
My quick read through the article shows nothing to dissuade me that his theory is based in science. |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.QandO.net
|
Unfortunately this "research" is published at the "Institute for Creation Research". Any "science" coming out of an anti-scientific body like this must be taken with a huge grain of salt. No, the linked article is published is published there. The research is performed and published elsewhere (ex. Physical Review Letters), but you wouldn’t know that since you took the narrow-minded route of intellectual laziness. |
| |
Written By:
huh
URL:
http://
|
|
Perhaps the Institute of Creation Research may not be the most scientifically compelling institution, but then again, there’s undoubtedly great pressure on the liberal illuminati not to report anything that would conflict with Obama’s global warming program. So because right-wingers have nothing to lose, they just may be the ones to listen to—and go ahead and do your homework. It can’t hurt. |
| |
Written By:
A.
URL:
http://
|
|
Well, i guess that won’t stop the big Zero from spending trillions to fix what ain’t broke. But that is what he is about isn’t it. |
| |
Written By:
capt joe
URL:
http://
|
I’ve got to agree with the first post. Right message, absolutely the wrong messenger.
I understand it’s an uphill battle to get this kind of opinion and papers about the causes of ’global warming’ out, but people with an interest and background in science are gonna click on that link and then close it out because of the position on creationism. That’s exactly what I did. |
| |
Written By:
sookie
URL:
http://
|
|
Messengers don’t validate or invalidate messages - they just deliver them. It’s up to the individual to be smart enough to figure that out. |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.QandO.net
|
I just today read a comment on this very topic at RealClimate.org.:
". . if [you are] thinking about GCR-cloud connections [the Svensmark theory], [modelling] is being done (it requires a full aerosol model including all the different modes of formation, accumulation, growth and impacts on clouds), but all estimates so far are that changes in ionisation makes only a negligible difference. This is of course completely independent of critiques of the statistical work put forward by some, and the plain fact that with no trends in GCR, it can’t be related to recent warming." You can find more detail about the critiques of Svensmark at RealClimate.
On the other hand, the consensus view of global warming rests on *many thousands* of peer-reviewed papers, so don’t be too quick to dismiss the mainstream, regardless of the views of the Creationists. |
| |
Written By:
Kevin McKinney
URL:
http://ispeakmusic.com
|
Hey Kevin - if we’re going to play the "website" game, RealClimate doesn’t have the best "scientific" reputation in the world.
Additionally, peer reviewed doesn’t mean "right" if the premise is wrong to begin with. |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.QandO.net
|
|
L7T3KI ouhuxubrkldt, [url=http://mecogdiipsoh.com/]mecogdiipsoh[/url], [link=http://ktnzciknkpcw.com/]ktnzciknkpcw[/link], http://udeiigigmlfb.com/ |
| |
Written By:
3
URL:
http://wmwralilkyup.com/
|
|
w5Lcbx prnbgrdyyvwp, [url=http://rejrqgpiwvsh.com/]rejrqgpiwvsh[/url], [link=http://whaocbiwcpaz.com/]whaocbiwcpaz[/link], http://ybaizyjemcbq.com/ |
| |
Written By:
3
URL:
http://qqazonzwcuik.com/
|
