Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Get Ready for Rolling Brownouts and huge hikes in electricity prices
Posted by: McQ on Friday, November 14, 2008

Forbes warns us:
If you think runaway oil prices are upsetting, just wait for what's in store for electricity. Similar forces are in play. Demand is rising fast; supply is not. The cost to get coal and natural gas out of the ground is going up, and to that expense must be added the cost of the carbon permits that Congress and the presidential candidates are contemplating. Environmentalists are getting power plants scotched. China is sucking up energy. Leave such dynamics in play long enough, and price spikes in electricity follow. But that's just the beginning. We may be facing brownouts (voltage reductions) and even rolling blackouts.

By as early as next year our demand for electricity will exceed reliable supply in New England, Texas and the West and, by 2011, in New York and the mid-Atlantic region. A failure of a power plant, or a summer-afternoon surge in the load, could make for a blackout or brownout. "There really isn't any excess in the system," says Rick P. Sergel, chief executive at the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC).
Price shocks are already a part of the system says the article:
Price shocks are already occurring. In May, long before peak summer demand, the wholesale price of juice jumped twofold in Texas, to $4 per kilowatt-hour, 25 times the average retail rate in the country. Prices exceeded the allowed rate of $2 for seven days and threatened the viability of power resellers who contracted to deliver cheap rates to consumers. New Yorkers may suffer a summer of price discontent if regulators are right about peak wholesale prices jumping by up to 90%.

In the past few years, in dozens of utility regions such as Georgia, Louisiana and Ohio, price hikes have ranged from 20% to 80%. Overall, the cost of electricity, which declined (in real dollar terms) for the last two decades of the 20th century, has been relentlessly tracking up since 2001.
We hear alot about our dependence on foreign oil and how we need to cut back. But our demand for petroleum based products has only risen 15% since the 1973 oil embargo. Electricity, on the other hand, has seen an increase of 115% in the same timeframe.

So how is that demand increase being addressed? Not very well:
Right now the nation has 760 gigawatts of power plants to meet current consumption, with another 154 in reserve capacity to maintain grid reliability. But in fact only 10 gigs is truly excess capacity. The other 144 is utterly essential to keep lights on when unexpected demand arises from heat waves, outages or maintenance downtime. That reserve will begin to shrink quickly. NERC estimates that over the next decade 135 gigawatts of new capacity will be needed to meet the growth in consumption. But right now plants producing a total of 57 gigawatts are planned.
To begin with, with only 57 gigs planned, we're well behind the power curve - pun intended. Even if we saw those 57 gigawatts of power come on line we'd still have a demand for 78 gigawatts more. That means the 10 gigs we now have in excess would be gone and we'd still have a deficit of 68 gigawatts in the system.

The fastest, and probably most economical way to address this deficit isn't any of the vaporware being peddled at the moment as "the future":
Renewable sources will not cover the growth in demand. While wind is gaining ground (and now supplies 1% of power), hydro's share (7%) is shrinking as dams are dismantled. Solar, at 0.01%, is an inconsequential contributor.
90% of our grid is now powered by coal fired, natural gas and nuclear power. By far the largest segment is coal - 60% I believe. So obviously the fastest and most economical way to address the deficit is coal.

But, apparently, because of "environmental concerns", the government plans on hobbling coal's ability to address the rising demand for power:
About 100 proposed coal-fired power plants in the USA may be required to limit their greenhouse gas emissions after the Environmental Protection Agency was blocked Thursday from issuing a permit for a proposed Utah plant without addressing the issue of global warming.

The EPA's appeals board said the agency didn't adequately justify its decision last year not to require controls for carbon dioxide emissions when it tentatively issued a permit for Deseret Power Electric Cooperative's planned coal plant near Vernal, Utah.

The panel sent the case back to the EPA's regional office to determine whether CO{-2} constraints are required. It said it recognizes "this is an issue of national scope that has implications far beyond this" permit.

The ruling has a far-reaching impact on dozens of coal-fired power plants awaiting permits. At the very least, it will delay by several months issuance of those permits, says Justin Hutt, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who represents utilities.
Coupled with the delay will be the immense cost associated with meeting limits set by the EPA. The power companies have two choices - allow themselves to be bankrupted as promised by Obama in his discussion with the SF Chronicle editorial board, or pass the cost on to the consumer through utility rates.

Of course utility rates normally have to be approved by a government board and government boards, like the Public Service Commission here in GA, are usually not open to $4 a kilowatt-hour rates, even if that is what it costs a coal fired plant to produce it under the limits imposed (nuclear is the answer but also unfavored, and the vaporware being pushed as an alternative isn't anywhere near ready).

So it is decision time for power companies - address the coming deficit with a relatively quickly built but unfavored answer which has the potential to bankrupt them when they try to recover the cost of implementing the "clean" technology or don't build and let the demand quickly outstrip the supply and allow price to ration the available electricity across and under-supplied grid.

Given the obstacles being imposed by government, I certainly know what my decision would be. And of course, this is precisely the result Obama said his plan would bring.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

Ironically, the power shortages will almost certainly be blamed on evil oil companies and the like. Somehow, the government is never at fault for problems it causes, unless the Republicans are in charge. And then, it is never over-regulation or crippling mandates, but the lack of regulation and mandates that are blamed.

Written By: Jeff Medcalf
Hmmmm.. That whole-home generator keeps looking better and better.

I’ve stopped brewing beer, mostly because of a lack of time, but I’m pretty sure I could convert my equipment to make biodiesel without a lot of cash. I wonder how many generators can run off that stuff?
Written By: Robb Allen
Just so, Jeff.
And look;
90% of our grid is now powered by coal fired, natural gas and nuclear power. By far the largest segment is coal - 60% I believe. So obviously the fastest and most economical way to address the deficit is coal.
But, how’s that work when Obama and company are out to eliminate coal as a power source?

Written By: Bithead
Powerful people are attempting to create a crisis they can exploit for their own means. There will be a power grab just like what we witnessed during the credit crunch. When the system collapses, Uncle Sam will be there with all the answers, and his solution will yet again be handing him your freedom for security. It’s sickening.
Written By: Nathan
URL: http://
I already know the governments answer when this comes to pass.
Nationalize the industry.
Written By: SkyWatch
URL: http://
The one thing people keep forgetting is it takes about five years to put up a coal, natural gas or combined cycle plant. Longer for nuclear, but alot of that is permitting. And several big projects have been shelved or canceled on the coal side due to eniviromental resistance to the permitting. So, even if you started today to build coal plants to make up the gap, they would not be online for five more years. And you would still need major infrastructure improvements to move that power to where it was needed.
Written By: JamesT
URL: http://
Honestly, I see this as the greatest threat to the US’s economy in the longer run. Electricity generation and distribution are not easy, but no significant infrastructure improvement has been added in quite a while. So, what happens to our economy when the electricity supply becomes unstable? High-tech companies move to where it is stable. Bye-bye US economic leadership.
Written By: Clark Taylor
URL: http://
Like, I blame Bush, because, like, he works for the oil companies, and, like, you know, he started that war in Iran or something because, like, he lied. And that’s, you know, like, why I voted for Obama. Because he’s, like, you know, gonna change everything.

Hey, man! Like, why did the lights just go out? Bummer.

/ sarc
Written By: docjim505
URL: http://
Hmmmm.. That whole-home generator keeps looking better and better.

My very thought.
Written By: Achillea
URL: http://
Achillea, I think about it as ’gap insurance’. Brownouts or short blackouts could be covered by the generator. The cost to run them is higher than what I pay the electric company per unit, but still.

Again, making my own biofuel would help a bit as well.
Written By: Robb Allen
Again, making my own biofuel would help a bit as well.
I think you ought to go back to making your own beer and drink your way thorough it all - in the dark of course.
Written By: McQ
Well, when it gets dark and there’s beer, and no TV, at least we won’t have to worry about a decline in population any more.
Written By: looker
URL: http://
You are going to need a generator anyway, to keep the beer cold.

It might be good to consider, when planning your generator installation, that if worse does come to worse generators will be in great demand and you will probably find that your neighbors aren’t so neighborly anymore.
Written By: timactual
URL: http://
It is not a secret anymore that our country is facing economic crisis today, with this situation it is not practical to eliminate financial options of the consumers. Some politicians in the government are looking forward to eliminate the payday loan industry because of the so-called predatory lending. However, getting rid of this would violate the financial freedom of the people. Predatory lending is only a mere allegation because they say that the APR is said to be so outrageous. Have you compared the APR of a payday loan with the APR of a bounced check, credit card fees or even a utility bill? Look at this:
· $100 payday advance with $15 fee = 391% APR;
· $100 bounced check with $48 NSF/merchant fees = 1,251% APR;
· $100 credit card balance with $26 late fee = 678% APR;
· $100 utility bill with $50 late/reconnect fees = 1,304% APR
What do you think is the better choice? Read more on Payday Cash
Written By: Lisa P
Not only do I like my generator (kept my full freezer happy during the last major black out) but also my fireplace insert. Think woodstove without the legs. We use it during the winter months and the zoned heat in the familyroom, kitchen and dining room never comes on. It is more expense to use (now) than natural gas but we include in that cost the entertainment value. The cats LOVE us when I start it up in the the fall and the kids and husband and I spent most of our off time in front of it. In fact as I write I have one cat in her paper box lid (don’t ask if you don’t own a cat) sleeping on the hearth rug in front of it. The other cat, after being told by her sister in no uncertain terms to stay away from my box/my spot is bathing on the couch about 7 feet from said heat source. Oh yah, I’m also on the couch...ah, warmth sweet warmth! (did I mention that it is rain/snowing out?)
Written By: jbmeisterswife
URL: http://
MUDdiL hcnbfxththau, [url=]uuoyswhvujcd[/url], [link=]fosucqzlwpxi[/link],
Written By: oleypspdqi
s8KLLo jqvqqisdxfcz, [url=]clxvbgoqqgds[/url], [link=]xuyxosvrkako[/link],
Written By: scwejhobxu
Thanks for the good site.
[URL=]trump taj mahal[/URL] trump taj mahal [URL=]bergdorf goodman[/URL] bergdorf goodman motel6 motel6 lumber liquidators lumber liquidators flagyl flagyl touro college barnes and nobel taxact tila tequila nieman marcus
Written By: trump taj mahal

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks