Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Support to battle "global warming" slipping
Posted by: McQ on Saturday, November 29, 2008

Skepticism, financial crisis and cost seem to be turning the public at large away the from the draconian and costly solutions AGW supporters claim are necessary to battle "global warming" (or is it "climate change" today?):
Less than half of those surveyed, or 47 per cent, said they were prepared to make personal lifestyle changes to reduce carbon emissions, down from 58 per cent last year.

Only 37 per cent said they were willing to spend "extra time" on the effort, an eight-point drop.

And only one in five respondents - or 20 per cent - said they'd spend extra money to reduce climate change. That's down from 28 per cent a year ago.
The poll was taken in 11 countries:
The 11 countries surveyed were Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Malaysia, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the United States. There were 2,000 respondents surveyed in China, including 1,000 in Hong Kong.

The survey was conducted as part of a joint collaboration between the financial institution HSBC and environmental groups, such as the Earthwatch Institute.
Most polled want to see investment increased in renewable energy research, however they are not at all keen on seeing tax schemes such as a carbon tax, established. Nor are they particularly high on collective international efforts such as Kyoto:
Results of the poll suggested that 55 per cent of respondents in the 11 countries said their governments should be doing more by investing in renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar and wave power.

That's more than double the 27 per cent who wanted their governments to participate in Kyoto-style international agreements to reduce emissions.
In fact, those polled seem to be of the mind that all sources of energy should be used and to tax one heavily when it is an integral part of the energy requirements of all nations seems foolish:
"People believe governments are focusing too much attention on indirect actions that pass responsibility for climate change onto others, such as increasing taxes on fossil fuels, encouraging individual environmentally friendly activities and participating in international negotiations, such as the Kyoto Protocol," the report said.
Given all of that, however, the report concludes the problem isn't that the approach favored by the AGW crowd is wrong, it is because the public at large is simply ill informed:
"More needs to be done to inform consumers about measures such as green taxation or carbon trading to help them understand how tangible these can be."
"Tangible" in that if the AGW crowd gets its way consumers will be paying through the nose for the relatively cheap power they enjoy today all while still chasing the not-ready-for-primetime "alternative energy sources".

That said, it's nice to see the ranks of the skeptics growing.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

But Erb has repeatedly said that the "science was settled"

How dare you post this......blasphemy!

Written By: shark
URL: http://
And what is so funny is that the BBC reported last week that "support for fighting climate change has increased, a new world survey says."

No, the survey says that support is decreasing, not increasing.

Liberals have this problem with numbers. When they don’t go their way, they either tell you that they are going their way, or that you must be stupid and can’t read.
Written By: James Marsden
URL: http://
You must be stupid and can’t read. This survey was about HOW climate change should be battled, not IF.
Written By: TomD
URL: http://
zKTF0n fflxqhcugmla, [url=]vzxysxgrpxgq[/url], [link=]vdvrkleaymch[/link],
Written By: wnzlunfe
HRMsLT oimxmgwpvtzb, [url=]zaqypnksrqfz[/url], [link=]afnldtjsrfhg[/link],
Written By: 7

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks