Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Why politicians can’t grasp "It’s not the crime, it’s the coverup"
Posted by: Billy Hollis on Friday, December 12, 2008

I'm in agreement with McQ about Obama's connections to Blago. It seems ridiculous that Obama's staff didn't talk to Blago about the Senate seat. They had completely above-board reasons to do so, and until the scandal blew up in their faces, no reason not to.

So why the evasion? As a commenter on that thread (jjmurphy) says:
These people seem to lie and cover-up even when there is absolutely no reason to!
I have a theory about that.

If politicians engage in such behavior by reflex, there can be only one reason: it works.

For minor, gray-area instances of abuse of office, the best possible case for the politician is to pretend the instances never existed at all. Absent compelling tangible evidence of wrongdoing, I think that behavior works a very, very large percentage of the time.

This makes sense because the entire process of abuse of office is necessarily as hidden as possible. All of the players have a strong incentive to keep everything hidden, and the best way to do that is to pretend none of it exists.

For a politician, pretending the incidents don't exist is much easier than trying to defend them as innocent. Given the gray-areas involved, pleading innocence is a hard case to make. And if you are constantly making that case over routine things that you do, you come across as sleazy.

So routine inquiries from the press, in which there might be allegation or suspicion, but no tangible evidence, are met with the Clinton strategy "Deny, deny, deny." A high percentage of the time, it works. It even worked for Clinton right up until the DNA analysis pulled the rug out from under him.

The "deny, deny, deny" strategy looks illogical to us because we only see the cases where it doesn't work. We don't see the hundreds or thousands of cases where it does.

In short, given the realities of daily political manuveuring, "deny, deny, deny" works so well that it becomes a habit.

There's an old piece of Heinlein dialog in which a fast-driving character says "I've never had an accident." The passenger responds "The way you drive, you'll only have one." It's a bit like that in dealing with scandal. The first time you fumble it is usually the last opportunity you get.

So politicians have no practice in seeing where to stop their habit of "deny, deny, deny" and engage in more candid explanations of their actions. That's why it's so hard for them not to resort to cover-ups. It's what they know how to do, and for each individual, it's always worked for them in the past.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
How long till we hear "This is not the man I knew..."

And can anyone tell me if there’s every been a president-elect who started his administration with a scandal already hanging over it?
 
Written By: Keith_Indy
URL: http://asecondhandconjecture.com
I’m in agreement with McQ about Obama’s connections to Blago. It seems ridiculous that Obama’s staff didn’t talk to Blago about the Senate seat. They had completely above-board reasons to do so, and until the scandal blew up in their faces, no reason not to.
I understand how you would think this is what is happening, and Obama seems to have parsed tightly enough to deserve this misinterpretation of what he has said.

Obama never said that no one discussed the Senate seat with Blago, in fact, in his press conference he promised to gather information about all contacts by his team with Blago regarding the Senate seat and make that onformation available to the public. What Obama did say was that no one on his team had been in contact with Blago regarding a DEAL for the Senate seat.

There’s a difference, but I do understand how it is being read in this way.

 
Written By: CaptinSarcastic
URL: http://
The "deny, deny, deny" strategy looks illogical to us because we only see the cases where it doesn’t work. We don’t see the hundreds or thousands of cases where it does.
Very interesting. I guess my first mistake was applying logic or common sense, or ethics, to anything to do with politicians. So they deny anything and everything knowing, as well, that others in government probably "have their back" regardless of party.
 
Written By: jjmurphy
URL: http://www.allthatisnecessary.com
Denial has been working great for Obama. Rev. Wright, Trinity Church, Bill Ayers. Why should Obama stop now?

My bet is that this will blow over too.
 
Written By: huxley
URL: http://
Sorry Cap
Obama never said that no one discussed the Senate seat with Blago
See here -
Asked what contact he’d had with the governor’s office about his replacement in the Senate, President-elect Obama today said "I had no contact with the governor or his office and so we were not, I was not aware of what was happening."
So his own words refute your statement.
 
Written By: meagain
URL: http://
So his own words refute your statement.


Read it again, Obama clearly and unequivocally said that HE PERSONALLY had no contact with Blago regarding this Senate seat in any way, and he maintains that.

Beyond that, he has not said that no one on his team has had any contact with Blago, and he has not said that no one on his team has had any contact regarding the Senate seat. What he has said is that he is confident that no one on hs team were involved in any discussions with Blago about a DEAL for the Senate seat.

Obama has also promised to make public any discussions between his team and Blago about the Senate seat, and he is gathering that information now and promised to provide information shortly.
"I had no contact with the governor or his office and so we were not, I was not aware of what was happening."
If you are referencing the use of the "we", it could easily be that he was correcting himself from "we" to "I", especially in light of his other statements.

 
Written By: CaptinSarcastic
URL: http://
Obama has also promised to make public any discussions between his team and Blago about the Senate seat, and he is gathering that information now and promised to provide information shortly.
Can you link us to this? This is the kind of thing, for me, that is a deal breaker. If he does, then I’m way inclined to support him. But if this turns into a black hole, then I cry foul.
 
Written By: meagain
URL: http://
Can you link us to this? This is the kind of thing, for me, that is a deal breaker. If he does, then I’m way inclined to support him. But if this turns into a black hole, then I cry foul.


My pleasure...

Link

Quote
I have never spoken to the governor on this subject. I’m confident that no representatives of mine would have any part of any deals related to this seat. I think the materials released by the U.S. attorney reflect that fact.

I’ve asked my team to gather the facts of any contacts with the governor’s office about this vacancy so that we can share them with you over the next few days.
I agree that if he puts it out there, he better deliver, and starting, say, next Wednesday, the status of this promise should be asked at every press conference until it’s delivered.
 
Written By: CaptinSarcastic
URL: http://
QUESTADT: You kill people at the — uh — at the behest of your superiors?

[CICCI’s lawyer tells him to say yes.]

CICCI: Yea — that’s right Counselor.

QUESTADT: And the head — of your family — is MICHAEL Corleone.

CICCI: Yea, Counselor — MICHAEL Corleone — right.

CHAIRMAN: Did you ever get such an order directly from MICHAEL Corleone.

[His lawyer shakes his head.]

CICCI: No — I never talked to him.

GEARY: Uh — Mr. CICCI could you, uh — amplify your answer a bit?

CICCI: Do what?

GEARY: Could you expand on your answer — I’m particularly interested in knowing — uh — was there always a buffer involved — .

[CICCI talks to his lawyer.]

— someone between you and your possible superiors, who gave the actual order?

CICCI: Right, yea a buffer — the family had a lot of buffers.

[CICCI and others laugh.]

—GODFATHER II
 
Written By: huxley
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider