Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Bill Ayers on Bill Ayers, oh, and education
Posted by: McQ on Monday, January 05, 2009

The resurrection of Bill Ayers continues. His most recent attempt is at Huffington Post where he ostensibly uses the opportunity to tell Barack Obama how he screwed up choosing the Education Secretary he did.

I mean, this guy is an education 'expert' didn't you know? His self-written HuffPo CV proves it:
Author and Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago and domestic terrorist.
Yeah, I added the bold part, but I hate things which are incomplete.

Ayers claims Obama's pick, Arne Duncan, has little to show to qualify him as the best pick for Ed Sec. Had he had the choice, he'd have picked Linda Darling-Hammond because, you know, she's:
... smart, honest, compassionate and courageous, and perhaps most striking, she actually knows schools and classrooms, curriculum and teaching, kids and child development.
Of course, unable to help himself, Ayers provides what I assume he figured would be a humorous aside. It actually is quite telling:
So I would have picked Darling-Hammond, but then again I would have picked Noam Chomsky for state, Naomi Klein for defense, Bernardine Dohrn for Attorney General, Bill Fletcher for commerce, James Thindwa for labor, Barbara Ransby for human services, Paul Krugman for treasury, and Amy Goodman for press secretary. So what do I know?
What indeed? That list itself (and one on which I'd bet Paul Krugman sincerely wishes he wasn't included) tells you all you need to know about why Darling-Hammond would be a poor choice.

Of course Ayers writes that all off to politics:
Darling-Hammond would not have been a smart pick for Obama. She was steadily demonized in a concerted campaign to undermine her effectiveness, and she would surely have had great difficulty getting any traction whatsoever for progressive policy change in this environment.
Of course, the LA Times succintly sums up the politics of why Ayers and his ilk would find Linda Darling-Hammond their "most qualified" for the position:
Stanford University professor Linda Darling-Hammond, who was named to Obama's education transition team, is one of the most-mentioned candidates. As a severe critic of the No Child Left Behind Act and an opponent of merit pay for teachers, she is favored by teachers unions.
The more I see of Ayer's thinking (and writing) the more I understand the lessons he's learned about subversion since his bomb throwing days. Join the system, use the system and subvert the system. And learn to use the language of freedom to sooth the dupes while you implement your anti-freedom agenda.

The proof of his success is how "mainstream" some of his radical ideas are becoming. Oh, I don't begrudge him his ability to throw them out there freely and often. That's part of the contract. I simply sit in wonder that they're taken as seriously as they are and he is considered one of the guiding lights in education. Of course he hasn't done it alone. There are a whole coterie of "educators" just like him who've been working for decades to subvert the education system.

And now, ironically, as a creature inside the system and successfully subverting it, he and his ilk become the system. Hopefully, somewhere out there, an anti-Ayers is learning the same lessons and preparing to implement them in the same way.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Castro, Mugabe, Kim Jong-Il and bin Laden didn’t make Ayers’ list???
 
Written By: docjim505
URL: http://
So, is Ayers’ purpose to make Obama seem more sane than he could be?

 
Written By: Bithead
URL: http://bitsblog.florack.us
Bill Ayers is writing for the Huffington Post? That should be a blast.
 
Written By: Bilwick
URL: http://
Your choice to cite an LA Times *opinion* piece to back your claims about Darling-Hammond is a mistake. That piece was wrong on many points. Among them, the two you cite here:

NCLB: Sure, she has criticized NCLB — who hasn’t?? But she also is on record through testimony before Congress in September 2007 as endorsing the act and its goal of closing the achievement gap and ensuring quality teachers. There’s a 30-page document of that testimony on the internet for anyone willing to do the research.

Merit pay: She has been a vocal advocate or rewarding teacher effectiveness. What she opposes is measuring teacher effectiveness by relying exclusively on the results of multiple-choice tests.

This is all a matter of public record and actual facts — as opposed to uncited opinions — are all accessible on the web.
 
Written By: Barbara McKenna
URL: http://
NCLB: Sure, she has criticized NCLB — who hasn’t??
So that’s true.
Merit pay: She has been a vocal advocate or rewarding teacher effectiveness. What she opposes is measuring teacher effectiveness by relying exclusively on the results of multiple-choice tests.
So her opposition to merit pay is also true.
This is all a matter of public record and actual facts — as opposed to uncited opinions — are all accessible on the web.
Yes it is. And it seems the "uncited opinion" is correct. BTW, I noticed you avoided the part about her being the darling (excuse the pun) of the teacher’s union. Don’t they also oppose "merit pay"?

The answer is accessible on the web if you’re wondering. If you haven’t the time to look, the answer is ’yes’.
 
Written By: McQ
URL: http://www.QandO.net
Off topic, but merit pay for teachers is never going to work well if schools are local monopolies. Rather than endless arguing about correct merit pay systems, schools should be free to make their own choices about how to do it, compete, and let the best systems rise to the top.

 
Written By: Grimshaw
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider