I have a question. What do these confirmation hearings actually do? At least theoretically?
If Senator X doesn’t want Candidate Y on the court, what good does it do for them to grill them with questions if they’re not going to vote them in anyway? Is the goal to persuade other people who would normally consider Candidate Y a valid choice otherwise? Because that seems like a pretty hard sell that isn’t best realized in such a display of puffery. |
| |
Written By:
Sharp as a Marble
URL:
http://sharpmarbles.stufftoread.com
|
|
I think Senator Kennedy has it exactly correct. The other two quotes might apply in normal times, when civil and substantive discourse prevailed in Washington,D.C., but not notw in the post-Reagan era of poisoned, take-no-prisoners politics. |
| |
Written By:
Glenn F. Baker
URL:
http://
|