Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
QandO has Moved
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
The Confirmation Hearings: quotes to remember
Posted by: Jon Henke on Monday, September 12, 2005

With the confirmation hearings beginning for Supreme Court Chief Justice nominee John Roberts, I think it's time to revisit three very relevant quotes...

Senator Ted Kennedy, declaring judicial philosophy and "single issue" positions off-limits during Sandra Day O'Connor's 1981 confirmation hearings.
"It is offensive to suggest that a potential justice of the Supreme Court must pass some presumed test of judicial philosophy. It is even more offensive to suggest that a potential justice must pass the litmus test of any single-issue interest group. The disturbing tactics of division and distortion and discrimination practiced by the extremists of the new right have no place in these hearings and no place in the nation's democracy."
Senator Joe Biden, acknowledging that a President should be expected to appoint candidates in tune with their own politics rather than those of the outgoing Supreme Court Justice, during the 1991 Clarence Thomas hearings...
"Some people say that the Supreme Court is already conservative and they ask what difference it makes to have an additional conservative on the bench. Well, I think that's the wrong question, and I reject that argument. First of all, I do not deny the President the right to appoint a conservative. As a matter of fact, I would be dumbfounded if he didn't. And so I fully expect the Supreme Court to be a more conservative body..."
Democratic White House Counsel Lloyd Culter acknowledging much the same thing in 1994...
Every president does, and I think most people concede, has the right to select nominees who have the basic judicial temperament, character, ability, qualifications to be a Supreme Court justice, but who generally share the president's sense of values—constitutional values, political values, et cetera.
Deploy these quotes as necessary, and let the games begin.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
I have a question. What do these confirmation hearings actually do? At least theoretically?

If Senator X doesn’t want Candidate Y on the court, what good does it do for them to grill them with questions if they’re not going to vote them in anyway? Is the goal to persuade other people who would normally consider Candidate Y a valid choice otherwise? Because that seems like a pretty hard sell that isn’t best realized in such a display of puffery.
 
Written By: Sharp as a Marble
URL: http://sharpmarbles.stufftoread.com
I think Senator Kennedy has it exactly correct. The other two quotes might apply in normal times, when civil and substantive discourse prevailed in Washington,D.C., but not notw in the post-Reagan era of poisoned, take-no-prisoners politics.
 
Written By: Glenn F. Baker
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider