Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
QandO has Moved
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Comprehensive Election Results, Analysis
Posted by: Jon Henke on Wednesday, November 09, 2005

It's probably too early to draw grand conclusions about yesterday's elections—and, in fact, they may be indicative of nothing but local issues—but here's a election-by-election take on what happened yesterday:

Divider



VIRGINIA



GOVERNOR: Democrat Tim Kaine (52%) beats Republican Jerry Kilgore (46%) by a somewhat larger margin than expected: 4-6 months ago, Kilgore was expected to win, but Kaine ran a strong campaign as an effective centrist—even a conservative Democrat—and Kilgore blew a few months whining impotently about Kaine's religious beliefs.

Virginia's current governor is a very popular centrist Democrat who models himself as a fiscal conservative, so Viriginia has decided they like the status quo, replacing a moderate Democrat with a moderate Democrat. The Big Winner here may be Mark Warner, who gains some political capital by showing he has coattails in Virginia and may be able to carry this state for the Democrats as a Presidential/Vice Presidential candidate.


LT GOVERNOR: Republican Bill Bolling defeats Democrat Leslie Byrnes.

ATTORNEY GENERAL: Republican Bob McDonnell (50%) appears to have defeated Democrat Creigh Deeds (50%) very, very narrowly. According to this election website, the vote total is McDonnell (940,815) over Deeds (936,152).


CONCLUSION: In every major race, Democrats did much better than expected. It's hard to tell whether this is the result of voter dissatisfaction with the national Republican Party, an energized Democratic base or the fact that, in general, Virginia Democrats ran to the center. It's very likely that it's a combination of the three. The lesson for Democrats is probably that the way to beat a bloated, struggling Republican Party in thrall to the religious right is to run to the middle.

Divider



NEW JERSEY


GOVERNOR: Democratic Senator Jon Corzine (53%) wins over Republican Doug Forrester (44%).

CONCLUSION: It's hard to read anything into this race. A Democrat replaced a Democrat in a generally Democratic state. Quelle surprise!

Divider



CALIFORNIA


BALLOT MEASURES: All 8 ballot measures lost, including the 4 pushed heavily by Governor Schwarzenegger.

CONCLUSION: After the election results came in, "Schwarzenegger pledged 'to find common ground' with his Democratic adversaries in Sacramento", which is code for "I got nothing. Your turn." Governor Schwarzenegger looks like a lame duck from here out—expect more Democrat-friendly compromises. If Arnold wants to run for re-election, he'll have to emphasize his centrist tendencies.


Divider



MAYORS


NEW YORK CITY: Incumbent Republican Michael Bloomberg wins easily.



DETROIT: Incumbent Democrat Kwame Kilpatrick wins narrowly.

CLEVELAND: Democrat Frank Jackson unseated incumbent Democrat Jane Campbell.

CINCINNATI: Democrat Mark Mallory deafeated Democrat David Pepper.

SAN DIEGO: Republican Jerry Sanders defeated Democrat Donna Frye.

BOSTON: Incumbent Mayor Thomas Menino deafeated Maura Hennigan.

ATLANTA: Incumbent Mayor Shirley Franklin easily won re-election.

Divider



OTHER ELECTIONS


TEXAS: "Texas voters Tuesday overwhelming approved a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage".

MAINE: Voters easily voted to uphold a law "which bans discrimination based on sexual orientation".

SAN FRANCISCO: "Voters approved ballot measures to ban handguns in San Francisco". (maybe I'm missing something, but it's hard to see how you can reconcile the 2nd and 14th amendments to make that Constitutional)

Divider



CONCLUSION: I'm really not sure that any larger implications can be seen in this election cycle. Most elections seemed to follow precedent, and most positions were retained by the incumbent, or at least by the incumbent party.

Democrats did a bit better than expected in Virginia, and Arnold Schwarzenegger suffered a surprisingly thorough drubbing, but then Virginia Democrats ran as quasi-Conservatives and California is a very liberal state.

Perhaps the lesson in all this is that Democrats have to run to the Middle in Red States, and Republicans have to run to the Middle in Blue states. If that's the lesson, though, it's not exactly a blinding, new insight.


MORE: Chad Dotson at Commonwealth Conservative is a go-to guy for commentary on the Virginia elections; he's also got a roundup of Viriginia blogger reaction. Another Virginian, Rick Sincere adds pics to the mix.

Meanwhile, Glenn Reynolds writes that he'll leave "analysis to people...who actually know things", but I've got no such compunction. I think Reynolds is right about this, though:
it seems as if the GOP voters didn't turn out for Republicans the way they did in 2004, and I think that can be laid at the feet of the White House and the Republican leadership.
That may loom heavy for the '06 elections.

UPDATE [McQ]: Or it may not. John McIntyre at RealClear Politics makes some comparisons which he thinks demonstrates no particular foreshadowing of doom for the Republicans in '06.
The MSM is trying to spin yesterday's election as a disaster for President Bush. But a simple exercise of just checking the election results from four years ago shows this to be partisan spin.

2001 Virginia: Warner (D) 52%, Earley (R) 47%
2005 Virginia: Kaine (D) 52%, Kilgore (R) 46%

2001 New Jersey: McGreevey (D) 56%, Schundler (R) 42%
2005 New Jersey: Corzine (D) 53%, Forrester (R) 44%

2001 New York City: Bloomberg (R) 50%, Green (D) 47%
2005 New York City: Bloomberg (R) 59%, Ferrer (D) 39%

The Democratic sweep of New Jersey and Virginia foreshadowed absolutely nothing for 2002. So the idea that the election results are proof of Democratic strength or Republican weakness is partisan blather, parroted by a sympathetic media.
I'm not sure I agree yet, but it is a good counter-point to the spin portending doom and gloom in '06 for Republicans.

UPDATE: Look to local elections for unmitigated good news...
All eight members up for re-election to the Pennsylvania school board that had been sued for introducing the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in biology class were swept out of office yesterday by a slate of challengers who campaigned against the intelligent design policy.
This, despite the fact that the general public overwhelmingly—Republican or Democrat—believes in either creationism or Intelligent Design. And yet, when a school board suggests that schools teach ID, they're shellacked by the voters.

I'd suggest this mean that voters are perfectly comfortable distinguishing between their scientific and religious beliefs.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Let them ban handguns. The inevitable rise in crime will be a good object lesson for the thick skulls who don’t comprehend the benefit of an armed society.

What am I talking about - if they haven’t got it by now, they probably never will.
 
Written By: Unknown
URL: http://
As far as the Detroit mayor goes...not that anybody cares...but it aint over yet. The FBI has confiscated all the absentee ballots as the lady that is supposed to make sure the elections are run fairly has been trouble for getting votes from dead/infirm folks.
 
Written By: mark m
URL: http://
One more thing about the Corzine win in NJ; the Big Money won easily. He bought the Corner Office as surely as he bought his Senate seat.
 
Written By: D
URL: http://
It’s a win-win for San Francisco. The media will assure that the new law is successful (notnewsmovealongnothingtoseehere) and if the SCOTUS overturns it, it will be the "stacked" court of Bush doing it. Ho-hum.
 
Written By: notherbob2
URL: http://
Jon hit the nail on the head, in regards to Kaine and Warner. Throughout the campaign, Kaine rode Warner’s coattails. Perhaps VA, who hasn’t elected a Democrat President since LBJ, will be a model for the Democrats who want to win the White House in ’08. Warner’s the Democrat I’d be most likely to vote for, at any rate.
 
Written By: CyanCyde
URL: http://
Isn’t Kaine much more liberal than Warner?

St. Paul was an unambiguously bad sign for Bush, where the Democratic mayor who endorsed Bush in 2004 got royally whupped by another Dem.
 
Written By: Geek, Esq.
URL: http://
Isn’t Kaine much more liberal than Warner?

St. Paul was an unambiguously bad sign for Bush, where the Democratic mayor who endorsed Bush in 2004 got royally whupped by another Dem.
 
Written By: Geek, Esq.
URL: http://
So, San Francisco just passed a Burglar’s Protection Act.

Here’s the money quote:
Supervisor Chris Daly, who proposed the measure, said the victory showed that "San Francisco voters support sensible gun control."
Do you hear that? Making it illegal for people to keep guns in their houses or businesses is sensible gun control. No, it’s not, Supervisor Daly; it’s gun elimination.

Don’t even try to tell me that the goal of gun control isn’t the confiscation and elimination of all guns.
 
Written By: Steverino
URL: http://steverino.journalspace.com
If one is looking for a prediction for 2006 and 2008 from the results in Virginia and New Jersey, they should look back 4 years. In 2001, Democrats won both Governors races by about the same margins as yesterday and yet those results were certainly not predictive for 2002 and 2004.
 
Written By: Kevin
URL: http://
SF is just following the successful handgun elimination in DC.

And by "successful" I mean "completely unsuccessful but you won’t hear DC politicians admit it".

And the only thing the Virginia election shows is that Kilgore was a really bad candidate.
 
Written By: k
URL: http://
Virginia governor’s elections tend to be referenda on the previous governor. Gilmore won on Allen’s coattails. Early lost to Warner on Gilmore’s weakness. Kaine won on Warner’s dominance of a smug and bloated GOP legislature. Kaine is a lot more liberal than Warner, though, so the next governor is likely to be Republican.

And while Kilgore wasn’t a bad candidate he ran a truly awful campaign. Bolling’s win as Lt. Gov suggests that a diehard conservative can win if he runs a positive campaign, something Kilgore didn’t do. Instead he sank into an attack ad mudfight with Kaine.
 
Written By: Bryan Ruffin
URL: http://
The key question is not one of actual numbers, but of expectations (which, presumably, are based on polling data and analysis before the election). That the actual results favored the Democrats over the expected results in most reasons may not portend anything about the 2006 elections other than NATIONAL troubles for the Republicans may cause the actual results to bend in favor of the Democrats. Presumably, in the absense of something more telling in the last moments of the local race, it had to be something OUTSIDE of those issues that affected the actual outcome. In this case, the quick and easy answer is general disaffection with the Republican party at the national level. And in a game of inches, that may be enough to swing the ACTUAL outcome of a lot of races one way or the other.
 
Written By: Chris Cooper
URL: http://www.gracelinks.org
I’m not exactly sure what insight we can draw from these elections, but I sincerely hope that the GOP takes it as a wakeup call regardless...
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
you screwed up the Cincinnati results twice - David Pepper lost, and Mark Mallory was not the incumbent
 
Written By: duh
URL: http://
The MSM is trying to spin yesterday’s election as a disaster for President Bush

I notice they don’t mention that Mayor Bloomberg has nice relations with the GOP and Pres. Bush and that didn’t seem to hurt him at all.....
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
you screwed up the Cincinnati results twice - David Pepper lost, and Mark Mallory was not the incumbent
Goddamn.

Fixed it. Thanks.
 
Written By: Jon Henke
URL: http://www.QandO.net

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider