|
Any chance that the female splodeydope that couldn’t, spilled the beans to the nice Jordanian intelligence service while they massaged her feet, and cooed Kumbayah in her ear in her candlelit cell, as our staunch defenders of freedom on the left would like? |
| |
Written By:
Abu Qa’ Qa
URL:
http://
|
Ramifications if true ... for al-Qaeda? For the "insurgency"? For Iraq? For Democrats?
Sorry, cheap shot. Just thought it was funny.
My thoughts? Terrorists seem to be cellular in operations. Look for a slight decline in attacks but then a sudden jump as a new figure fills in the vaccuum. I expect Syria or Iran to provide headhunting services for this.
While it’s always good to take out the most visible, unlike many lefties I don’t believe that BinLaden / Zarqawi = Al Qaeda. If anything, I’d like to see US troops quadruple their efforts (and making it very, very visible) to show we’re not going to stop just become #1 is now a pile of #2... |
| |
Written By:
Robb Allen (Sharp as a Marble)
URL:
http://sharpmarbles.stufftoread.com
|
It’s a pleasant thought to think that sob may be shovling coal in hell at this very moment. Here’s hoping. If correct they should send his body to Jordan for appropriate handling. |
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
Ramifications if true ... for al-Qaeda? For the "insurgency"? For Iraq? For Democrats?
Sorry, cheap shot. Just thought it was funny. Hardly a cheap shot.
The Democrats have been pinning their entire shot at any gains at all at all levels of government on the handling of Iraq. The idea that we’re not doing so badly after all, doesn’t bode too well for the Democrats.
That said, your remaining point about BinLaden or Zarqawi <> Al Qaeda is well taken, and we still have a long road. Still, when all you can hear from the left is complaints about a lack of forward progress in Iraq, Zarqawi taking a dirt nap will create a silence while they figure out what the hell they’re going to bitch about NOW. |
| |
Written By:
Bithead
URL:
http://bitheads.blogspot.com
|
Immediate ramifications for Iraqi insurgency: 1) cessation of suicide bombings targetted at civilians (markets, mosques, funerals, restaurants, hotels) 2) continued assassinations of individual middle-class Sunnis who "collaborate" or participate in a new government 3) continued car bombings againt Iraqi security forces 4) continued roadside bombings against American convoys 5) continued sectarian violence (Baathist insurgents vs Sh’ia death squads) 6) continued kidnapping and extortion by criminal gangs
Near Long-Term - Iraq may come to resemble Afghanistan - nearly functioning with pockets of violence and recalcitrance in outlying border regions.
Long Term - Iraqi Baathists who fled to Syria and Jordan won’t be going home.
Ramifications for Al Qaeda: 1) They’ll turn their sights on US targets to shore up their flagging public support. 2) In the near term, they may go underground as their funding, namely Saudi financiers, has been effectively been cut off. 3) They’ll try to hold onto Pakistan.
|
| |
Written By:
broslosky
URL:
http://
|
A pretty good summation of possibilities, broslosky. I also agree with Robb’s comment on a temporary decline in terrorist activity.
Fortunately, the temporary decline would coincide with the period leading up the election, which is a good thing.
Over a longer span, if the election goes well and foreign sources of aid and fighters continue to be squeezed, then I expect a transition away from the pure terrorist acts towards simple criminal acts. There’s a fuzzy line between a gang of terrorists and a gang of criminals. |
| |
Written By:
Billy Hollis
URL:
http://
|
Of course, at this moment it appears the White House is claiming it ain’t him.
Either way, step up efforts ten-fold. Start putting pressure like there’s no tomorrow. Smoke the f*er out if he’s still alive. |
| |
Written By:
Robb Allen (Sharp as a Marble)
URL:
http://sharpmarbles.stufftoread.com
|
Of course, at this moment it appears the White House is claiming it ain’t him. So I guess we better keep using the subjunctive tense for the time being.
The real problem in a situation such as this is the amount of potential disinformation put out by both sides. The original report could be disinformation by the terrorists to get the US all excited, and then primed for a letdown when Zarqawi reappears. Or it could be disinformation from the US to get some members of the insurgency to panic. Or it could be true that he’s dead, but the US is now claiming it’s not him to create confusion among the terrorists.
Heck, I can’t even predict what my wife will like for a birthday gift. Trying to guess the actions of people (the terrorists) who come close to my definition of clinically insane is a pretty chancy game.
|
| |
Written By:
Billy Hollis
URL:
http://
|
Zarqawi’s death might be of benefit to Bin Laden & his wing of AQ.
Zarqawi’s Jordan bombing has backfired. This has be portrayed as a personal issue with Zarqawi, but the longer he leads part of AQ, the more all of AQ also owns the attack in Jordan. Zarqawi has also been advised to not do things to curry negative public opinion in the Muslim which might prevent a Caliphate. He’s been doing a poor job of that.
Zarqawi dying would be a plus for Bin Laden & his vision for AQ’s future, especially after Jordan.
Just a thought as to how Zarqawi just happened to possibly be killed this soon after the Jordan attack. |
| |
Written By:
John
URL:
http://
|
|
If it IS him, expect the Dems to start whining that Bush set them up again... |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
If it IS him, expect the Dems to start whining that Bush set them up again... Democrats: "What happen?"
Media: "Someone set up us the bomb."
Bush: "How are you gentlemen."
Democrats: "It’s you."
Bush: "All your talking points are belong to us."
Democrats: "What you say?"
Bush: "You are on the way to humiliation. You have no chance to win, make your time. Ha, ha, ha." |
| |
Written By:
Billy Hollis
URL:
http://
|
Ramifications if true ... for al-Qaeda? For the "insurgency"? For Iraq?
umm then, we, ahh delcare victory and chopper out civvies in Huey’s, off the Bagdhad Palace roof.
We win! Republicans win! We have parades; Yay!
Thank God for the Republicans! |
| |
Written By:
Rick D.
URL:
http://
|
Zarqawi is Blair’s Goldstein - keeping him alive - or leaving doubts as to whether he is dead - is more important than actually killing him. Zarqawi is no longer a person - he is a Zelig type figure who will never die, but will never have lived, except in photos and third hand reports from the middle east. If he did not exist, the Bush administration would need him. But he is ultimately, unimportant. Bush’s task will grow more difficult, and less difficult, without him. Assuming he died, which assume he lived in the first place.
|
| |
Written By:
mkultra
URL:
http://
|
So we’re getting tips as to the locations of the hardest core AQ types in Mosul. Sounds like mucho progress.
Also, waxing so many mid-level guys of AQ and the insurgents of course affects them. Just like it would us. Except they have less of a population base to work with.
The baathist insurgents will probably slowly taper off as they finally decide its better just to get a job and get on with life. Once US troops are all gone, who’s going to want to keep fighting "the occupiers?" |
| |
Written By:
Harun
URL:
http://
|
Zarqawi is Blair’s Goldstein - keeping him alive - or leaving doubts as to whether he is dead - is more important than actually killing him...[assuming] he lived in the first place So true! And that’s why Blair’s regime devised the London subway bombings, taking a cue directly from 1984.
Really, having the results in Iraq (if it really exists) of "Zarqawi" (wink-wink) on the telly each night is simply not enough to frighten the British sheeple into supporting Poodle Blair’s "war". Obviously, Bushitler convinced Blair that he must bring the "war" home in order to bolster lagging support. Apparently Blair’s tight control over the media (who frankly are just the PR arm of Blair’s government) was not enough to convince the populace to support his efforts.
So, needing to bring the actual fear home, Blair (aka "Zarkawi") sent several innocent, misguided citizens into the tubes and onto buses. These citizens, being proles, had no idea of course, that they were going to be exploding, killing their beloved comrades.
And he’d have gotten away with it, if it weren’t for you meddling kids! |
| |
Written By:
O’Brien
URL:
http://
|
|
Dang, O’Brien! I think I can hear Karl Rove’s helicopters coming to take you to the Pod People for questioning. |
| |
Written By:
Wacky Hermit
URL:
http://organicbabyfarm.blogspot.com
|
Rick D. wrote:"umm then, we, ahh delcare victory and chopper out civvies in Huey’s, off the Bagdhad Palace roof." I expect we’ll drive out at moderate speed, and that you’ll never admit there’s any significance to that.
Yours, TDP, ml, msl, & pfpp |
| |
Written By:
Tom Perkins
URL:
http://
|