You’ve fallen a little behind the curve here, McQ.
The "Bradley Effect" was the rage for five minutes in explaining the Hillary comeback in New Hampshire. (It turned out that Obama’s poll number didn’t change, just that a huge number of women turned out to vote for Hillary.)
No, the new thing, the new explanation, is the Clinton explanation: blacks vote for blacks AND whites vote for whites. AND THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH IT. IT’S PERFECTLY NATURAL!
That was featured reporting/commentary on CNN last night, led by a black correspondent.
So, you see, now it’s O.K. to vote for the candidate’s race, not for the candidate. And in the Super Tuesday primaries, unlike in South Caroline, blacks will not be quite so influential.
So, all you white Democrats out there, Bill Clinton wants you to know its O.K. to vote white.
To his credit, Dick Morris predicted this would happen a few weeks back. |
| |
Written By:
Martin McPhillips
URL:
http://mcphillips.blogspot.com/
|
So, you see, now it’s O.K. to vote for the candidate’s race, not for the candidate. That’s only true in the primaries, not in the general election :) |
| |
Written By:
Steverino
URL:
http://
|
"Given expectations does Obama have to win by a significant percentage to get any momentum coming out of SC for Super Tuesday? If so what’s the percentage?"
Truthfully, I believe very few voters are actually undecided at this point. Most are at least leaning one way or another. If the past few states have proven anything, in both Dem and Rep races, it’s that the voters doesn’t much CARE what other states are saying this time around. What has changed are conflicting elements rallying around their associated candidates. If that’s true or not will be revealed in tonight’s exit polls - and, like you stated, any revelations there are more likely to shape the coming races than who actually comes in 1st, 2nd, or even 3rd. |
| |
Written By:
COdude
URL:
http://
|
|
vote for obama he only steals from blacks. love REZKO |
| |
Written By:
ffggvb fffff
URL:
http://
|