|
There is nothing the Democrats (and the Left) won’t do or say to remain in power. Jimmy Carter and Ted Kennedy both proved that in the 80s when they appealed to the former Soviet Union for assistance in defeating Ronald Reagon. And Howard Dean and the DNC is proving it once again. |
| |
Written By:
SShiell
URL:
http://
|
Jimmy Carter and Ted Kennedy both proved that in the 80s when they appealed to the former Soviet Union for assistance in defeating Ronald Reagon. I knew Carter was a traitor, but I didn’t know that about Ted. I’m not exactly surprised, as Ted is an awful guy, I just didn’t realize he was a low as Carter. |
| |
Written By:
Don
URL:
http://
|
|
can we question their patriotism now? |
| |
Written By:
kyleN
URL:
http://impudent.blognation.us/blog
|
Did Obama immediately repudiate the ad?
Not a whole lot of sympathy for McCain considering how he threw NC republicans under the bus for an entirely valid ad.
If there was a way for all three candidates to lose this November, please tell me which box to check. |
| |
Written By:
jpm100
URL:
http://
|
|
Somehow I read "NC republicans" as "NC reptilians" and realized I’ve been reading a bit too much of P. J. O’Rourke lately... |
| |
Written By:
Doug Jones
URL:
http://
|
|
I’m shocked, shocked. This is outrageous. I suggest several more posts about how outrageous it is, each accompanied by the video. Let’s keep this one alive. |
| |
Written By:
Retief
URL:
http://
|
Why are Democratic ads accurately depicting attacks on US soldiers in Iraq that are actually happening every day, morally wrong - but Republican ads depicting planes flying into NYC skyscrapers morally okay?
For that matter, are you suggesting that Republicans ads showing American soldiers being bombed in Iraq - and then accusing President Obama of, oh, unpatriotically negotiating with Iran, for example, would be equally morally wrong?
What, exactly, is wrong about graphically depicting violent consequences to Americans and associating them with the expected policies of a future president?
Was Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy Ad immoral? How about the Willie Horton add associating Michael Dukakis with convicted rapists? Any fundamental difference? It seems similar to me - message, this guy’s policies = innocents harmed.
I’m not taking a position here; just curious to see if you can articulate this a little better. Is there any sort of principle at work here?
|
| |
Written By:
glasnost
URL:
http://
|
Why are Democratic ads accurately depicting attacks on US soldiers in Iraq that are actually happening every day, morally wrong - but Republican ads depicting planes flying into NYC skyscrapers morally okay? I guess that convenient memory of yours has forgotten who was screaming like a scalded cat about that? Something about politicizing the war?
Yeah, figured it somehow slipped down the memory hole.
Jon talks about it here - I assume you missed that too.
|
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.QandO.net
|
It seems similar to me - message, this guy’s policies = innocents harmed. McCain’s policies? John McCain declared war on Iraq and sent our troops there?
Isn’t this the same war Hillary Clinton approved of?
and the DNC represents who?
Oh, that’s right, DEMOCRATS, like...um.....Hillary Clinton.
|
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
|
Because it’s a visual representation of what "Pinch" Sulzberger, thought about with regards to US soldiers and NVA forces. Of course, they could have ripped off insurgent sniper fire video from CNN, or even more explicit stuff from Youtube. Liberals use the IED video, as an argument, why we should retreat, while Conservatives, use the 9/11 video to point out the dangers in the world;which liberals rarely seem to focus on. |
| |
Written By:
narciso
URL:
http://
|
