Why won’t this administration look at this revenue source?
Because of their false agenda, that’s why. They’re still convinced that, despite 17 years of no warming (as recently admitted by the head of the IPCC), oil is bad and “green” is good and that they’re doing something to save the world. Disregard the fact that green is still unviable. Disregard the fact that everywhere it has or is being pushed, energy costs are skyrocketing. Nevermind the fact that we are sitting on a sea of fossile fuel products that we only need to access. Screw the fact that science can find no discernable warming. Their minds are made up.
That said, there’s also the fiscal side of the house. The debt. The deficit. And the demand by Democrats to raise more revenue.
Unfortunately, because of their agenda, they’re likely to completely screw up a golden opportunity to bring in much more revenue and drive energy prices down, because their agenda is against fossile fuel. And we all know the party agenda comes before what is best for the country.
Enter the administration with a renewed plan to tax oil companies instead of opening access to the vast natural riches we enjoy. The result? Well this chart will help you comprehend the vast differences in the two policy choices (full size here):

So the either/or is “tax ‘em or open access”. The difference:
According to a 2011 study by Wood Mackenzie, increased oil and natural gas activity underpro-access policies would generate an additional $800 billion in cumulative revenue for government by 2030. The chart puts into perspective the size of these accumulating revenues – enough to fund entire federal departments at various points along the timeline. By contrast, Wood Mackenize also found that hiking taxes on oil and natural gas companies would, by 2030, result in $223 billion in cumulative lost revenue to government.
It only proves the old saw -”If you want more of it, reward it and if you want less, tax it”. Think about it – money to help run government and pay down the debt (not to mention the thousands, if not millions of jobs created) being passed up in the name of false science and agenda politics.
Meanwhile, we’ll be left in the cold and the dark, thanks to agenda driven policies with no foundation in reality.
~McQ













Better…and more radical…still—
return to the states the vast lands misappropriated by the Federal government. There is no Constitutional basis for these holdings.
Devolve the land back to the people.
Bruce, you’re operating under the assumption 0bama both understands basic math and wants Capitalism to work. Neither of which are in evidence.
You win.
Ehh, not sure I want him too. I note that characters like Hugo Chavez are able to leverage oil profits to keep the “machine” running. Sometimes it is better if the “machine” runs out of fuel faster. I want Obama’s policies to be obvious failures, not obscured by cheap energy.
The entire Climate Change “haze” is never about climate, it’s about the money.
I seem to recall before the last election seeing prognostications that in his second term, Obama would use the idea of “going regional” as part of his plan to “marginalize rural areas to send more money to urban centers” that support more Democrats.
Pingback: Why won’t this administration look at this revenue source? | Liberal Whoppers
Getting gas down to $2 will do more to help the economy than anything.
Pingback: Any Horse(shit) Will Do | Daily Pundit
Pingback: No Funds For Essential Services/Billions For More Solyndra’s Says Obama | Power To The People
Pingback: Obama Choose’s Deceit Not Truth – Fear Mongering Not Optimism – I Win Not We Win | Power To The People