Free Markets, Free People

amnesty

Interesting, but not surprising

The first shoe drops on the President’s executive amnesty order:

According to the opinion by Judge Arthur Schwab, the president’s policy goes “beyond prosecutorial discretion” in that it provides a relatively rigid framework for considering applications for deferred action, thus obviating any meaningful case-by-case determination as prosecutorial discretion requires, and provides substantive rights to applicable individuals.  As a consequence,  Schwab concluded, the action exceeds the scope of executive authority.

Ya think?  So, now what?  Will this proceed up the line to the Supreme Court?  And if it does, will the “ObamaCare is a tax” court manage to actually rule as this judge has, that the executive has unconstitutionally exceeded his power?

Anymore, you never know.

~McQ

California Democrat – lets give 1 million illegal immigrants amnesty

Perhaps I’m missing something here but hasn’t the main argument of this administration about the various immigration laws passed by states been that immigration is the solely the job of the Federal Government?

Isn’t it true that they’ve challenged various state level immigration laws on those very grounds?

So what gives with this:

Nearly 1 million undocumented immigrants could live and work openly in California with little or no fear of deportation under an initiative unveiled Friday by a state legislator and others. Assemblyman Felipe Fuentes, a Democrat, is helping spearhead the measure, called the California Opportunity and Prosperity Act.

The proposal was filed Friday with the state Attorney General’s Office, marking a first step toward a drive to collect the 504,760 voter signatures needed to qualify for the ballot. Fuentes called the measure a "moderate, common-sense approach" necessitated by the federal government’s inability to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

"I hope this shows Washington, D.C., that if they fail to act, California will take the lead on this critical issue," Fuentes said in a written statement.

They will? 

I’m sure Eric Holder’s DoJ will be asking, fairly quickly, by what right California assumes the right to do such a thing.  You know, in other states, they were at least trying to enforce existing federal law when they were challenged.  Here’s a guy trying to circumvent it.  I would assume that would give the chief law enforcement officer, who has been so quick to jump on those states trying to enforce existing federal laws, to be on this guy like white on rice.

Regardless whether Californians would support such a measure, implementation would depend upon the federal government agreeing not to prosecute participants.

Well, lets see … didn’t California legalize medical marijuana and didn’t the feds say it didn’t matter because it was against federal law to engage in such activity?  And didn’t they continue to prosecute marijuana cases and raid supposed “legal” providers?

So what about circumventing federal law in this case?

Mr. Holder?

Oh, and of course, nothing could go wrong with this could it?  A “million” illegals get amnesty.  California becomes a magnet for illegals.  Pay taxes?  Why? They’re illegal and there’s no penalty for that.  Why fess up and pay taxes?  California has already said it’s not going to deport them.  That doesn’t mean they’re then going to pay taxes for heaven sake.

Another brilliant idea brought to you by a  … Democrat.

~McQ

Twitter: @McQandO